Sample Essay on Dark Tetrad

violencia contra la mujerWhen thinking about the Dark Triad, you may refer to the epic fantasy. Each of the three evil powers are exploitative and heartless, as well as malicious in its nature. The first one is remorseless but charming. The other one is cynical and deceptive. And the third one is entitled and grandiose, the egoist in its unique way. None of the human beings has a desire to face this dark trio.

However, you may have no choice for the reason that the Dark Triad is not an illusion at all. The issue comes from the formal personality theory and is related to three traits reflecting the worst of humanity when being united. Those are the three faces of what we all consider anti-social. And the names of these faces are the evidence for their inhumanity: narcissism, psychopathy and Machiavellianism.

For many years the psychological science experts have been studying the aspect of the Dark Triad in personal theory. However, nowadays experts exert every effort in order to challenge the Dark Triad. The representatives of the University of British Columbia and the University of Texas at El Paso are  not going to somehow question the legitimacy of the traits; however, they struggle that the construct is not complete. According to their statements, the Dark Tetrad is the real evil core of the three personality. Sadism – that is how the missing villain is called.

The studies have shown that sadism is the other, equal dark power that is definitely more sinister in a particular way. Usually the psychopaths have no qualms regarding hurting someone. However, their aggression has a certain purpose as a rule. As for the narcissists, they appear to be hurtful only when they’re threatened. At the same time, Machiavellians seem to be too calculating to risk retaliation unless they know that they have too much on the line. And here come the sadists. They are quite unique when the question is about engaging in a certain unprovoked malice – cruelty that requires some efforts, as well as has no visible benefits.

In order to prove this, the scientists have performed an experiment. They chose volunteers, who were required to play a PC game. They believed the game was some sort of a competition with one another, and whether they won, each of the volunteers had an opportunity to blast the opponent with a pretty loud noise. The volunteers preferred the loudness, as well as the duration of the penalty. To add more, the opponents never fought back. In other words, there was no justification for retaliation. Also, half of the gamers were supposed to ‘work’ in order to get a chance to be cruel. The very moment they won a round, they had an opportunity to accomplish a monotonous and dull counting task before getting a chance to administer the noise blast.

Every individual with the dark personality traits were sadistically cruel to the innocent opponents when they had an opportunity to hurt someone. However, the sadists tended to increase the attacks’ intensity when they found out the opponents wouldn’t be able to respond. Moreover, they were the only ones, who were eager to spend energy and precious time to get a chance to be cruel.

Everything mentioned above suggests that sadists have an excessive appetite for cruelty that is their number one motivation. Without a doubt, the very act of inflicting suffering and pain on innocent individuals is pleasure-driven, as well as rewarding. That is why sadists make sure to pay any price for a unique chance. For that reason the scientists conclude that sadism is more dangerous that the other dark evils and is the very core of the Dark Tetrad.

References:

  • Juvonen, J., & Gross, E. F. (2008). Extending the school grounds? Bullying experiences in cyberspace. Journal of School Health, 78, 496–505.
  • Lenhardt, A. (2013). Teens, smartphones & texting. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project.
  • Linton, D. K., & Power, J. L. (2013). The personality traits of workplace bullies are often shared by their victims: Is there a dark side to victims? Personality and Individual Differences, 54, 738–743.
  • Ljepava, N., Orr, R. R., Locke, S., & Ross, C. (2013). Personality and social characteristics of Facebook non-users and frequent users. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 1602–1607.
  • McCosker, A. (2014). Trolling as provocation: YouTube’s agonistic publics. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies (in press). doi:1354856513501413.
  • McCreery, M. P., Krach, K. S., Schrader, P. G., & Boone, R. (2012). Defining the virtual self: Personality, behavior, and the psychology of embodiment. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 976–983.
  • O’Meara, A., Davies, J., & Hammond, S. (2011). The psychometric properties and utility of the short sadistic impulse scale (SSIS). Psychological Assessment, 23, 523–531.
  • Paulhus, D. L., & Jones, D. N. (2014). Measuring dark personalities. In G. J. Boyle, D. H. Saklofske & G. Matthews (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological constructs. San Diego, CA: Academic Press (in press).
  • Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556–563.
  • Phillips, J. G., & Butt, S. (2006). Personality and self-reported use of mobile phones for games. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 9, 753–758.